Verdict
The Toyota C-HR is a good car – almost a million sales across Europe proves it’s hitting the spot with customers. Stylish, well equipped and efficient, there’s no doubt that it ticks a lot of boxes, but we wish it offered more driver involvement and integrated its (admittedly excellent) safety tech a little better.
- Mileage: 1,377
- Efficiency: 54.6mpg
I’m usually pretty good at making up my mind about whether I like something or not; films, music, sport – I’ve got strong opinions on most of life’s more divisive topics. Normally, that would include everything to do with cars, too, but I’ve reached an unusual impasse with my Toyota C-HR long-term test car. After almost three months and 1,600 miles of driving, I just can’t decide on my true feelings towards the funky hybrid SUV.
When the C-HR was delivered back in April, my first impressions were largely positive; its dramatic styling and smart Midnight Teal metallic paintwork are a classy combination, while the distinctive 19-inch machined alloys add a more muscular look that works well with the C-HR’s squat, sporty exterior. It’s a striking design that definitely turns heads.
Inside, the front cabin is a little snug, and there isn’t a great deal of room for taller passengers in the rear, but it feels well screwed together and the materials on show are mostly of a good standard.
